This is by Global warming scare mongers have no credit in my view. They are too quick to jump on a "consensus" bandwagon. Too quick to blame human activity for what may be natural changes.
Want proof? Read this.
The 'Old' Consensus?
Computer models can give you any result you want them to, even if you don't realize you want a particular result. Maybe CO2 caused Global warming is true and is happening, but these early adopters don't get any credit for "guessing right this time" in my book. They keep throwing out predictions and when one finally comes true, they act like they are so smart and visionary.
No, they are scare mongers who, like a blind squirrel, may find a nut once in a while.
Update
Hansen was funded by George Soros
Sunday, September 23, 2007
Ice age or Greenhouse?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Rasool used a computer program that Hansen wrote. That does not mean that Hansen agreed with Rasool's conclusions. If I borrow your pen, does that mean you agree with everything I write with your pen? More on what's wrong with the IBD editorial here.
The point is that computer models are only as good as our understanding of what we are modeling. 30 years ago CO2 wasn't a greenhouse gas, now every time I exhale I'm destroying earth.
The Global warming community seems more interested in belittling global warming critics than in doing real science. Scientists should be honoring critics not making fun of them.
As far as the computer program, if it included an atmospheric mathematical model, then it shows Mr. Hansen didn't understand the atmosphere then, so why should we believe him now?
People are TOO quick to make doomsday predictions based on poor models. Then and today... We just know the models are wrong for the ones used 30 years ago, but told to "trust us" about the models used today.
Well, it turns out Hansen's recent publicity was funded by George Soros. Maybe the funding doesn't effect anything, more maybe it does. It certainly would have change the tone of the hearings to know it was a political activity, and not purely a scientific activity.
Post a Comment